Journalism

To be a journalist or not to be a journalist

Dave Winer points out on Scripting News why he disagrees with David Weinberger when he says bloggers are not journalists. I'm very glad I watched the video post that started off the most recent round of this question. As Weinberger's post hits the nail on the head.

Too many folks who get wrapped up in this question seem to think there is a special aura that goes with being a journalist. That the title is a lofty one. It is a serious profession and it is filled with honorable people who work hard, in much the same way that many professions are.

As Weinberger points out there are a handful of journalists who blog. There are also many bloggers who have moments of journalistic greatness.

Bloggers are, by and large, story tellers. To say that anyone who has a blog is a journalist is like saying everyone who tells a joke is a comedian. Journalists are a group of people who work, primarily, at telling the story. They share many traits with bloggers who are mostly not journalists. Bloggers are, by and large, from walks of life other than journalism. They are people who like to write, tell stories and communicate information. But the true value in blogs is that they are written by the people living the story not an objective outsider looking in with a degree of disinterest. Journalists should be as concerned as Jay Leno is about uncle Bob telling good jokes at the birthday party. I don't think it really concerns Leno that there aren't going to be any open dates in Vegas.

Weinberger hits the sweet spot when he says that in the future blogging will be done by the people who are living the convention, who are seating delegates, who are attending.

Robots.txt vs. FOIA

Scripting News:Kicking Ass, the DNC weblog, on robots.txt disabling of caches on White House pages about Iraq. Interesting point. Now would be an appopriate[sic] time to ask the Democrats if they will have a different policy should a Democrat be elected to the White House in 2004.

It is also the time to take a look at how robots.txt should be used on government sites. Should web crawlers respect robots.txt files on government sites? The information is covered by the Freedom of Information Act. Perhaps bloggers should make requests for the earlier copies of the documents before the pages were changed.

By contrast the Colorado State robots.txt file has some comments in it about why each directory is eliminated.

Should robots respect robots.txt files on government servers?

Blogs as journalism

Discussions have been going on for some time about the status of blogs. Are they journalism? I believe that they can be in many ways. They can break stories. They can contain information that is factually correct. One of the biggest shortcomings, however, is the lack of the integrity of the publication. Not the kind of integrity shown to be recently lacking at the New York Times, but the kind of integrity that what I see today is what I will see tomorrow.

Scripting News was recently plagued by a robot that was rather annoying (to Scripting News). However, it brought to light one of my long-time frustrations - Blogs change. Not just by adding new postings but by removing or changing content. There is not the integrity of an issue of Time magazine - something that once held in my hands and read will remain the same. While it would be technically possible to print many common blogs this defeats the growth of knowledge created by the rapid recombination of data possible through blogging.

For example, some weeks ago, Dave Winer, publisher of Scripting News grew weary of the mud slinging and petty nature of personal attacks and turned off Scripting News. This is completely in his rights as a publisher. The problem is what happens when Scripting News does go away. For whatever reason. There is no comprehensive library that will preserve every issue ever published there (or here for that matter). How will scholars of the future tap the publications of today as they become increasingly temporary?

The Great SARSscam

On the way home for lunch there was a discussion on the radio about SARS. Dr. Len Horowitz's called in to talk about SARSscam.com which proclaims to be "a website established by a consortium of companies that produce and market advanced nutritional products, healing remedies and technologies, and environmental conditioning appliances for purifying air, water, and electromagnetic fields."

While this appears to be strictly true there are three companies listed as the site's sponsors. All three are LLC's that on their About page say are directly parts of Dr. Horowitz's business interests. In fact the same article appears on one of the sponsors site, apparently identical to the SARSscam site.

One of the prime arguments is that SARS is about companies making money. Why then, since influenza kills thousands a year are these same monied companies that are supposedly in charge of all this not "making" the media report about their influenza related products?

Subscribe to Journalism